Can "Shock Art" and its development in time still be considered as art? Can there be an answer?

Shock art is any type of artwork that employs shock to agnise a point, ask a question, or

purely to capture the audiences attention. These days ein truththing has changed. The very meaning of the word Art has become compromised. It is a common eyeshot within the habitual today that art is only set for its ability to shock. And if it isnt shocking - it isnt art! In art, taboo images be no longer taboo. That means artists have to push further. accordingly art becomes even more shocking as era goes on. Throughout time, artists have been attempting to do one thing and that is to grant us think differently.

Art has always shocked the society in which it is created. Even the likes of Manet, Van Gogh and Picasso were all criticized by the public in one way or another. One of the major paintings that caused such an outcry was Manets Dejuner sur lherbe (Luncheon on the grass) this dated abide to the mid Nineteenth century. The vulgarity of this piece caused it to be considered as Shock Art. In the early twentieth century Picasso seemed to be echoing this specific type of art when he particoloured Les Demoiselles Davignon consisting of five prostitutes in a brothel. Picasso appeared to be turning his back end on middle-class society and the traditional values of the time.



hither Innovation caused controversy.

Photographs and paintings such as Manets and Picassos shield the viewer in a way; they provide a barrier so the extent of the shock effect is reduced. Marcel Duchamp, in effect, invented the endpoint Shock Art (in the context that we would understand it today) when he created his disreputable piece The fountain. Can a urinal be classified as a work of art? From this moment the concept of art...

If you indispensableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper