Case Brief (united States V. Lopez)

United States v . Lopez (514 US 549Facts : Alfonso Lopez Jr was a student of Edison lavishly School in San Antonio Texas . In March 1992 , he arrived at take aim carrying a .38 caliber gun lade with bullets . The prepare officials found out or so this . The gun was confiscated and he was arrested . He was initially charged on a put down floor Texas Law for firearm bullheadedness on cultivate premises . The next day the landed estate charges were discount and the federal official official agents charged the answerer of violating a federal law which is the Gun-Free School regulates Act which forbids any individual wittingly to possess a firearm at a em military group that [he] knows . is a school zoneDuring the trial , the respondent challenged the constitutionality of this particular formulation under the Gun-Fre e School Zones Act . The partition Court denied this motion and upheld the constitutionality of this supplying . It declared that this provision is a constitutional play of the originator of Congress to regulate activities in and affecting transaction . Since the business of elementary , middle and gamy schools affects interstate highway occupation , it is therefore within the occasion of Congress to regulate the carrying of guns in school . On arouse , the Court of Appeals reversed the glare court s finishThe Law and extreme Provision at be intimate : At effect here is the proper interpretation of that power delegated by the piece to Congress which is the power to regulate vocation with foreign nations and among the several(prenominal) states and with the Indian TribesIssue : whether the Gun-Free School Zones Act is reasonable exercise of power under the Congress interstate handicraft articleThe Legal assent of the Court : Congress exceeded its authority under the Commerce Clause . It is therefore! unconstitutional .

It ruled that although in previous apparent movement the Supreme Court has upheld a replete(p) variety of congressional acts set stinting activity , the obstinance of firearm in school has no connections whatsoever with economic activity It has no meaty effect on interstate doctor . This particular provision under the Gun-Free School Zone Act is criminal in nature that has nonhing to do with commerce per seDissenting Opinion : In his dissenting opinion , justice Breyer argued that gun-related military group in schools has an effect in interstate commerce in the brain that fury under mines to a significant tip the quality of facts of life that is critical to economic prosperity . When violence is widespread in schools learning is affected and threatened .What is cardinal in this lineament ? At first glance , the decision in this shell dismissing a criminal charge against a student who real carried a loaded gun in school may be perplexing . Yet , I believe this showcase is not about school violence . This case is not about enforcing ban on guns in school . This is about the extent proper delineation of boundaries betwixt the powers of the federal governance and the state governance In this case , the federal government made a mistake in using as basis a federal statute...If you pauperization to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper