Tobacco tax

baccy plant taxation good for health, government cash in hand Tobacco map kills over 5 one million million million people severally yr and is the largest virtuoso preventable cause of premature death. l Tobacco is very costly to society through high costs to diplomacy baccy-induced disease or through loss of productivity as a result of the premature deaths. But governments put one across a tool to combat the costs of tobacco use tobacco taxation.Higher tobacco prices decrease phthisis and encourage people to quit increase the price of tobacco products Is the single about effective way to reduce economic consumption-2 Ralslng prices discourages uptake of tobacco se by young people and motivates people to quit tobacco use, piece raising government revenues. 3 Numerous studies in high income countries have shown that a 10% increase in cigarette price decreases consumption by about 4%. 4 Available data suggest that consumption in pocket-size and middle income countrie s is even more than antiphonary to price.For example, the estimated decreases would be about 5. 5% in China, 5. 2% in Mexico and 5. 4% in southeast Africa. 5,6,7 For tobacco products other than manufactured cigarettes, studies are relatively rare, although similar effects have been open. 8 Price (SA rand) Packs 100 25 Real Cigarette prices (2008 base) Packs sold per capita 15 10 5 20 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2009 Year Inflation-adjusted cigarette prices and cigarette consumption, South Africa, 1980-2009 Higher tobacco prices ransom lives Decreasing consumption would translate into lives saved.The military man Bank has estimated that tax increases to swot the price of cigarettes by 10% would 00 Cut the number of smokers in the knowledge base by 42 million 38 million of them in low to middle income countries 00 Save 10 million lives 9 million of them in low to middle income countries. 9 PHOTO WBB Trust WWW. NCDALLIANCE. ORG How many lives could tobacco tax increases sav e? Recent economic analyses for countries with large numbers of smokers found that in China in Russia Increasing tax from 40% to 68% of the retail price would Increasing tax from 37% to 70% Increasing tax from 33% to 70% OOGenerate IJS$16. billion a yr in additional tax revenue OOGenerate IJS$6. 5 billion a year in OOGenerate IJS$4. 9 billion a year in OOHelp 54. 6 million smokers to quit OOHelp 10 million smokers to quit OOHelp 5. 4 million smokers to quit oosave 13. 7 million lives12 OOSave 3. 5 million lives OOSave 1. 3 million lives14 Tobacco and poverty Those aliment on lower incomes are more in all probability to smoke, and policy makers are sometimes relate that increasing tobacco tax will penalise people who are already living in reduced circumstances.But it is important to note that poorer smokers are also the most price sensitive in other words, they are the most likely to quit or reduce their consumption of tobacco when taxes are increased. This has been substantiat e in multiple studies. For example, when tobacco excise was increased in South Africa over several years in the mid to late 1990s, the largest reductions in smoking prevalence were seen among young people and low-income earners. When smokers quit, their families avail in two ways through improved health and through improved cash in hand money previously spent on tobacco products can be spent on food, education and other necessities. If policy makers are concerned about the economic impact of tobacco tax increases on low-income smokers who do not reduce their consumption, they can invest part of the added tobacco tax revenue in social spending. 13 In addition to savings to the public sector, business can also benefit from a healthy workforce, with lower absenteeism and fewer losses of skilled workers through early retirement due to illness or early death.A cost-benefit analysis in the I-JK showed that a 5% tobacco tax increase over the rate of pretentiousness would increase go vernment tax revenues by over IJS$814 million a year and result in wider economic benefits of over $440 million per year in the first five years of the policy. 18 Tobacco use is the one risk factor common to the main groups of NCDs. Accelerated death penalty of the FCTC is an essential way to tackle NCDs and save lives. 1 World wellness Organization (2009) WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic 2008.Geneva World Health Organization. 2 World Health Organization (2004) Building blocks for tobacco control a handbook. Geneva World Health Organization. 3 Jha P Chaloupka F. (1999) Curbing the epidemic governments and the economics of tobacco control. Washington, DC World Bank. 4 World Health Organization (2010) WHO technical manual on tobacco tax administration. Geneva World Health Organization. 5 Hu T-w, Mao Z, Shi J, subgenus Chen W (2008) Tobacco taxation and its potential impact in China.Paris world-wide Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. Tobacco tax increases benefit t he economy Governments benefit directly from tobacco tax increases. Increased revenue can establish for tobacco control interventions, combating infectious isease or other priority interior(a) programmes. Countries with efficient tax systems have benefitted from substantial tax increases.