Writing tips and writing guidelines for students. Case study samples, admission essay examples, book reviews, paper writing tips, college essays, research proposal samples.
Thursday, March 7, 2019
Revenue and Volume Variance
Polysar CASE crowd 3 Polysar Limited complete on 1942, Now employed 6,650 people Structure Basic Petrochemicals, Rubber, change Products Rubber Group is Profit Center Rubber Group produced 46% of Polysar sales Group 3 2/13 NASA Sarnia 1 full treatment Produce Butyl & HaloButyl HaloButyl (from 1984) Sarnia 2 Plant Produce Butyl (operation 1984) 1) 1984 95,000 t 2) 1985 65,000 t EROW Antwel correct Produce Butyl & HaloButyl (1964, 1979 modified) 1) 1981 Prduced Butyl(75%) & HaloButyl(25%) 2) 1985 Prduced Butyl(50%, 45,000t), HaloButyl(50%, 45,000t) delegate NASA to ERROW Butyl(21,000t)Group 3 3/13 Q1. The meaning and trueness of the volume variance. NASA Rubber particle? Sales Performance(1986) authentic realize sales Revenue 63,239,000 cipher 58,660,000 Deviation 4,579,000 exceed 3,735,000 exceed Gross brink ? Sales Volume Up 40,945,000 37,210,000 ? Feedstock Cost Down Group 3 4/13 NASA Rubber Division Net Contribution(1986) Actual Budget Dev iation Volume Variance 11,375,000 -6,125,000 5,250,000 U Gross Profit / NSR 8. 2% 13. 7% -5. 5% Net Contribution 876,000 2,005,000 -2,881,000 Group 3 5/13 Volume Variance ? Volume Standard Fixed ? Actual Tonnes Produced Variance Cost Per Tonne ? ( + Demonstrated dexterity ) (? ) Sarnia 2 (1984) ? ? NASA to EROW Group 3 6/13 Q2. The best sales and production dodging for EROW Division, NASA Division and the Rubber Group in Total. EROW Division Strategy transference Advantage (From NASA) Feedstock Halobutyl ( )? Group 3 7/13 Accurate Budgeting NASA Division Strategy Volume Variance? NASA? Not Transfer Reach Capacity SARNIA 2? Production Capacity? 95,000? (1984) 65,000(1986)? Group 3 8/13 The Rubber Group Strategy Be a drawing card in high margin, specialty rubbers Main Strategy , ? 1) Transfer? (Regional Service) 2) 3) ? Group 3 9/13 Q3. Management accounting performance system to remediate the report ing and evaluation of the Rubber Group performance will be raised. Strategy Group 3 10/13 Strategy ? ? Transfer Transfer ? Negotiation Price Group 3 11/13 ( ) Strategy SARIN 2 Product Volume Variance N N N Gross Profit / NSR E N Net Contribution E 1986 65,000 t 1987 95,000 t Improve 35,000 t 5,250,000 11,375,000 -6,125,000 8. 2% 35. 7% 876,000 22,661,000 13. 7% 5. 5% 35. 7% 2,005,000 22,661,000 2,881,000 Be a leader in high margin, specialty rubbers Group 3 12/13 The End
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment