Robert Cummings
Business/415
August 29, 2011
Audrey Myer
State of Confusion Paper
The verbalise of Confusion acquires that motortrucks pulling trailers moldiness come a typecast B hitch installed on the truck to commute legally through the state. The newly enacted edict states that proposers of these trucks must abide by the law or simply drive around the state of Confusion. Unfortunately, Tanya Trucker, a traffic owner, believes this statute is non legal and intends to file suit as the hitch compulsory is an additional business expense and a burden to her business operations. The topics in this paper will encompass what laws, if any, are infra question and which legal avenue Tanya Trucker and her company arouse to pursue. Furthermore, this paper will display which court will retain jurisdiction, if Tanya Trucker will prevail, and identify the stages of a civil suit.
Constitutionality of the Confusion Statute
The case provided directly relates to the federal Interstate Commerce clause of the United States Constitution. The clause states that the federal government has the right to thwart commerce within foreign Nations, several States, and Indian Tribes (Lawnix, n.d.). The statute in the state of Confusion is attempting to regulate commerce by imposing a law that requires truckers to install a Type B hitch therefore can be launch unconstitutional. Interstate Commerce allows business transactions through trafficking to bollocks up state lines that should non be prohibited or regulate heavily by state laws. In the event the state of Confusion wished to impose such a statute and require only in-state organizations install a Type B hitch, this would not be considered unconstitutional or even reach federal...If you neediness to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment