Problem of Teenage Pregnancy

Over the quondam(prenominal) few familys striplingage maternity rates aim heavy(p) substantially. More than one million teenagers will become great(predicate) this year in Canada, and the number is growing. Many socioeconomic factors set gestation period rates, such as different races, different religions, financial status, schooling and family background. Another watch is the genderual practiceual instruction children argon receiving or not receiving at schooling and at home. While the problem of teenage gestation is acknowledged, solutions be approach shot slowly.Some parents feel that maternal quality is a result of the lack of sex education courses taught in schools, while others feel that these courses end up encouraging teenagers to become sexually active. Studies claim been done to find out retributive how beta sex education courses are, and what effect they have on pregnancy rates. The amount of sex education they receive is not as important a factor, acc ording to a new study. (Fewer girls get pregnant when refer in community, E8) Toronto Sun, 1998)Other sources say Sex education courses, advocated to prevent teen pregnancy but denounced as encouraged sexual interest, appear to have little or no effect on teens sexual activity. such courses also have no noticeable effect on preventative use and pregnancy rates among teenagers. It was plant that while students do memorise about sex and contraception, they do not appear to alter their behavior. (Okie, 1996) The courses that are offered in schools have proven not to have any influence on the teenage pregnancy rates.The reason for this may be that the courses are just not being taught in effect(p)ly or are targeting the improper age group Two major goals of the school sex education programs are to reduce the incidence of unwarranted pregnancy as tumefy as the rates of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. However, to be effective, programs must begin early. If we wait until an age when most adolescents are sexually active, we might have to combat an acquired behavioral pattern of ineffective STD/pregnancy prevention behavior.Some statistics order that in the 1984 survey of school superintendents found that children do not all seem to know what we expect them to know. It was found that 50% of schools offered a family life education program. Whereas 87% of urban districts had a program, only 25% of rural districts had a program. Canadian school children ages 9, 12 and 15 showed a considerable lack of sexual education. Only 35% of grade 7 students knew that is was possible for a girl to get pregnant between the ages of 12 and 15.Most judgment pregnancy could not give until after age 16. (Herold, 1997) Through many studies it has been proven that sex education in schools has little or no noticeable effect on the teen pregnancy rate. The conclusion has been made that the rate of teenage pregnancy is rising, but there is no solution in sight. Many t hought having sex education in the schools would reduce the rate but statistics have suggested that they will not. There have been suggestions of other ways of reducing the mettlesome rates. Sexual counseling and access to prevention (Beard, 1992) could be tried.In the mid-1970&8243s the Ontario government started to provide universal access to publicly funded family planning and sex education. (Beard, 1992) If these were used in combination with school sexuality education it has been predicted that a decrease in the pregnancy rate would occur. Changes in the social mode, (MacDonald, 1996), which teenagers have been exposed to have been linked with rising adolescent pregnancy rates. These forces must be understood if we are to avoid to obvious pitfalls, take up successfully on our traditional social and cultural strengths, and design effective models of prevention.